I participate in a forum with some of my friends. Sometimes, we discuss political issues. Recently, a thread was started with a summary of personal views on certain issues. Here's most of my post:
Economic Macro Free markets yield the most wealth for everyone, as competition is ensured. Tariffs for gov't income are one thing, but trying to prevent native companies from outsourcing labor is something else. It seems selfish and self-destructive to me, to try forcing companies to hire overpaid American workers. I am for globalization.
Micro Basic economic theory says that GDP is maximized at a certain level of taxation and government spending. I'm not a fan of subsidies and lots of regulations, but if it's going to happen, I prefer it on a local level (federalization). Although there is a danger of local big companies "buying" local officials, it's generally best to customize things to the specific environment.
Price controls are harmful. Why, NYC, why?
Social Services Most people can take care of themselves, especially in a capitalistic society in which primary and secondary education is paid for. Most people have the opportunity to secure resources for after they can no longer work. Let them do so.
Those that can not, the disabled, should be taken care of by the government. Also, children can't exactly take care of themselves if thier parents are neglectful or abusive; so, the government adds a social service part to that criminal justice issue.
Foreign Policy Government should secure our national security. I can appreciate the charity that our government doles out, in terms of resources (#1 donor in the world) and military power (through which the oppressed are freed). However, I don't think it's the government's place to take our money and give it away to others - let us do that ourselves, if we so choose (we should).
Religion and State Well, the Constitution says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." This seems to encourage congress not to regulate religious practice, at the most.
All beliefs should be tolerated (although certainly not all actions should be). I would love to see Catholicism become the national religion of the United States and have it taught in all of our schools. I don't think that such a development would violate the constitution.
All of our laws force people to do stuff they don't want to, or not do stuff they do want to. Their foundation is a morality that is mainly Christian. Citizens need to learn to live with that, even if they're trying to change it in the meanwhile.
Government Operations Privatization of schools would be a great development. The government might need to set up and run some in remote areas, though. Use the government's money to give people vouchers for education. This would be very empowering to the poor, and would totally negate the relevance of controversial curriculums (to an extent), since the family is choosing their school.
Less oversight over everything would be good. The government is waaay too big. I would like to see LESS government funding of research, among other things.
Military Operations I suppose if we need uber military power to protect ourselves, or we have it already, we might as well put it to good use saving the oppressed abroad. It seems that such liberating has been a side affect of our aggressive pursuit of security. I don't see why we have to be much more powerful than everybody else, though. We're in a good position to secure such standing, but... I don't think it's worth the money.
Privacy Certainly, privacy presupposes life and a certain amount of safety - it'd probably rank higher (less fundamental) as a heirarchical need. I think a common-sense approach here would be best. In dangerous times, make efficient sacrifices of privacy. When threats are low, let people enjoy a little more privacy.
Constitution Interpretation We friggin' ELECTED the legislators to write the law. I do NOT like the judicial branch changing what our representatives decided. If there's some rulings based on the intent of the law, well, there's some room for that within common sense. In general, however, it seems to me that our judicial officials are being too loose with their "interpretations."
Social Controls People were given free will and it is not our place to make them choose right over wrong, or believe what is true. However, it should be one of our highest priorities to motivate one another to believe and do what is right. The government and its laws are a medium for this motivation. "Clockwork Orange-" like brainwashing is too far, since it takes away free will. However, it's ok to legislate morality, from banning killing innocents to banning blasphemy.
Anyone can join the forum. The address is
http://www.alaerth.net/forum/index.phpFeel free to post your own response in that forum, or as a comment to this post.